Brittany Aldean made it clear that she won’t be bringing any more Balenciaga pieces into her home in a post shared on social media.

The wife of country music star Jason Aldean shared a photo on Instagram showing her carrying clear plastic bags out of the house.

She was reacting to a recent scandal at the fashion house after it came under fire for a holiday campaign photo shoot that featured child models posing with teddy bear bags covering BDSM clothing.

Brittany has been criticized for making homophobic comments, sparking backlash from several country music musicians, including Maren Morris.

In her photo, Brittany was seen looking sleek in an all-black ensemble featuring a slim sweater and tight black pants.

She stood tall in a bunch of narrow dark stage boots and wore her long light secures in delicate waves flowing down her shoulders, which put the focus on her thick dark feline eye shades.

As opposed to standard murky garbage sacks, she chose clear plastic packs for her organized photograph. They were loaded up with Balenciaga gear, including a $3000 orange totes and $400 slide shoes.

One dark thing with the design house’s name explained in white block letters seemed, by all accounts, to be a hoodie that sells for an expensive $1,050, while one more blue satchel seemed, by all accounts, to be a thing that the brand sells for around $2,500, however the blue variation seems, by all accounts, to be sold out.

Brittany likewise seemed to have a knapsack thrown behind her that was loaded up with more dark Balenciaga clothing.

‘It’s trash day @balenciaga,’ she declared in her caption.

Balenciaga recently came under fire after releasing its holiday 2022 ad campaign.

The photoshoot including disturbing images of young children posing with Balenciaga’s Plush Toy Bag, which was designed to look like a colorful teddy bear, but covered in black straps resembling BDSM gear.

The actual youngsters didn’t seem, by all accounts, to be in 𝓈ℯ𝓍ualized positions or dress, however the photoset included other upsetting subtleties like void wine glasses and champagne woodwinds.

Balenciaga at first moved the fault to the photographic artist Gabriele Galimberti, who snapped the photos in Paris.

Nonetheless, Galimberti doesn’t seem to have planned or enriched the set on which he was capturing, and the brand thusly concurred that he didn’t have command over the shoot.

Exacerbating the situation, another different Balenciaga photoshoot likewise included an upsetting association with pedophilia.

For the brand’s spring 2023 mission, big names including Bella Hadid and Nicole Kidman were shot in business settings in what seemed, by all accounts, to be a high rise.

Notwithstanding, extremely observant onlookers noticed that one of the photographs highlighted a heap of reports behind the scenes, which were uncovered to be a printout of a High Court administering in US v. Williams, on whether kid erotic entertainment could be viewed as a safeguarded type of free discourse.

The two photoshoots were not associated, yet pundits stressed that together they addressed an unsettling society inside Balenciaga.

Standing up: Brittany made her distaste for Balenciaga clear, even as other stars associated with the fashion house have stayed quiet

Although it was speculated that the documents might have been left over from the filming of a legal drama, the fashion house still struck out at the ‘reckless negligence’ of North Six Inc., the company that managed the photoshoot.

Notably, North Six Inc. only worked on the spring 2023 campaign, and not the holiday campaign featuring child models and the BDSM bears.

Although the documents might have been an unfortunately placed prop, the spring 2023 shoot featured an art book by the painter Michael Borremans.

Borremans, a Belgian artist, has had a varied career, but he is responsible for a disturbing 2017 series of paintings titled Fire From The Sun.

The paintings depict a group of toddlers against what appears to be a photography studio backdrop, but the naked children are surrounded by severed limbs — presumably from unseen adults — in several images, while they are smeared with blood and seemingly castrated in others.

Kim Kardashian, who is a brand ambassador for Balenciaga, previously said she was reevaluating her relationship with the fashion house, though she was lambasted by critics for not cutting ties with it.

Brittany has had her own recent scandal after she made transphobic comments that were called out by Maren Morris and other country musicians.

In a getting-ready video, Brittany said — seemingly out of nowhere —  ‘I’d really like to thank my parents for not changing my gender when I went through my tomboy phase. I love this girly life.’

Maren and Cassadee Pope expressed outrage at her comments, which suggested that parents were forcing their children to transition and seemed to imply that transgender people were only going through a phase.

Cassadee took to Twitter on Friday and responded: ‘You’d think celebs with beauty brands would see the positives in including LGBTQ+ people in their messaging. But instead here we are, hearing someone compare their “tomboy phase” to someone wanting to transition. Real nice.’

Maren snapped back: ‘It’s so easy to, like, not be a scumbag human? Sell your clip-ins and zip it, Insurrection Barbie.’

Maren’s husband and collaborator Ryan Hurd also added in a tweet: ‘Scoring quick points by picking on trans kids isn’t something that is brave at all.’

Not holding back: Over the summer, Brittany ran afoul of Cassadee Pope and Maren Morris after making transphobic comments; Morris seen in September in Las Vegas

Response: The country singers had a back-and-forth online with Brittany, who was supported by her husband Jason

Brittany later doubled down, comparing gender-affirming care to genital mutilation on social media.

‘Some parents want to be accepted by society so badly that they’re willing to make life-altering decisions for their children who aren’t old enough to fully comprehend the consequences of their actions,’ she wrote.

Another of her posts questioned when children under 18 should be able to take puberty blockers — which are believed to be reversible, though they may have a negative effect on bone density — or to undergo gender reassignment surgery.

Another questioned whether children younger than 18 should be able to choose to take puberty blockers, or undergo gender reassignment surgery.

Brittany’s husband Jason expressed support for her throughout the back-and-forth, which eventually led his publicity firm to drop him as a client.